Wednesday, 21 March 2018

Israel's racist front groups must be resisted, not placated or wished away

A march through Glasgow last weekend organised by Stand Up to Racism (SUTR) has caused some considerable debate among a number of campaign groups and individuals. At issue was the attempt by pro-Israel lobby group Confederation of Friends of Israel Scotland (CoFIS) to participate in the demonstration.

Understandably, and not uncommon to many left/progressive exchanges, this matter has generated no small amount of divisive feeling. However, that should not deter us from fair, critical comment and constructive reflection. In that spirit, I'd like to address three main aspects of this issue.   

1. The problem with CoFIS's participation in this event.
2. The mistakes SUTR made in their response to this situation.
3. How it could have been better handled, and other lessons to be drawn.

1. The first things to note is that SUTR did not specifically 'invite' CoFIS to this demonstration. Many people within and supportive of SUTR also issued comments on CoFIS, ranging from dislike to outright rejection. Many expressed a wish for CoFIS not to be on the rally.

However, the key problem here lay not in such non-invitations or individual reservations, but in SUTR's refusal to issue a formal statement rejecting CoFIS as an organisation. In this sense, SUTR did 'provide' an implicit 'invitation' to CoFIS.

It was the specific absence of any clear statement from SUTR declaring CoFIS unwelcome that compelled all main Palestinian solidarity groups and other bodies to register their concerns and objections. 

Another thing that should be clarified here is that no Palestinian solidarity group has ever called for Jews to be banned or removed from this or any other event. Any such call would be abhorrent. Even if such stewarding was logistically possible, it would be utterly wrong, and quite clearly anti-Semitic.

Again, the specific question here concerns the standing of a particular organisation, one which openly supports, approves and campaigns for a racist, apartheid state, the very forms of institutional discrimination which SUTR profess to be standing against.

CoFIS are not being opposed because of the religious affiliation of their members (many of whom are, in fact, Christians as well as Jews) but because of their support for Israel and its racist/apartheid oppression of Palestinians.

Beyond CoFIS's own well-peddled narrative, this is not an issue about Jews, it's an elementary issue about human rights: the right not to be a victim of racism/apartheid; and the right to resist any organisation which openly supports a state, military and civil apparatus dedicated to the perpetuation of that racist/apartheid treatment.

A cursory look at CoFIS's reactionary literature (much of it provided by right-wing bodies Stand With Us and Christians United for Israel), social media postings, campaigning postures and deceitful banners claiming to be 'pro-Palestinian' is enough to see what this organisation really represents.

Beyond any reasonable mitigation, it's very hard to understand how SUTR could have been unaware of CoFIS's zealous pro-Israel status, and how completely antithetical those positions should be to SUTR's own supposed aims and values.

A key claim aired by SUTR was that its movement encompasses people of many political positions, and that the theme of the march - resisting Islamophobia, anti-Semitism and standing up for refugees - could not include Palestine as a 'defining' point, or that it 'didn't fit the criteria'.

This is not only a straw man argument, with regard to the obvious diversity of political opinions, but a more troubling evasion of SUTR's supposed objectives.

Of course, even on a demonstration such as this, there will be many diverse views held by participating individuals. But, again, it's the presence of a particular racist-supporting organisation that matters here.

Groups like the Scottish Defence League insist they are not racist, that they are 'merely defending national interests'. Would SUTR defend the right of such an organisation to march with them? Of course not. They understand precisely what this organisation represents, and would shun them as hostile interlopers.

The same principle applies to CoFIS. Why didn't SUTR look at what this organisation really represents, and act accordingly?

If one accepts that Israel is an apartheid/racist state - as every major Palestinian solidarity group, and many civil and political others, do - then this is the criterion against which CoFIS participation in an SUTR event most certainly should be judged.

Some SUTR advocates also argue that these kind of marches, in continued opposition to Islamophobia, anti-Semitism and purging of refugees, is the best way to support oppressed Palestinians.

This, again, is feeble mitigation. The idea that Palestinians will take any kind of comfort from such 'solidarity' is not only risible but deeply patronising. SUTR's failure to issue any formal disapproval of an organisation working consistently against Palestinian rights is the very last kind of 'support' Palestinians need.

One need only consider the group of Palestinian firefighters in Scotland last week, courtesy of the FBU, who felt unable to join a march that included a CoFIS organisation banner and Israeli flags, all visible and humiliating symbols of their oppression.

It should also be noted that to be seen standing alongside such images risks interpretation by other Palestinians as collaboration.

What's really at the heart of SUTR's positioning here is a fear of being labelled anti-Semitic. And this is why it's so important for bodies like SUTR not to fall for that mendacious narrative.

Progressive people and organisations should be under no illusions about the power and resources of Israel's lobby machine in its relentless determination to smear opponents and distort the issue. That's why they should be particularly alert to front groups like CoFIS trying to build respectable cover for their racist/apartheid supporting activities.

2. As the issues and implications over this march began to surface, a number of solidarity groups and others began making representations to SUTR. These included Scottish Friends of Palestine, Association of Palestinian Community - Scotland, Scottish Palestine Solidarity Campaign, and Scotland Against Criminalising Communities (SAAC).

In addition, Glasgow Palestine Human Rights Campaign (GPHRC) expressed their objections, pointing out that, as a street body, it has been raising public awareness (with leaflets and other information) about CoFIS, and its associate group Glasgow Friends of Israel (GFI), since their appearance over two years ago.

An SUTR steering meeting was convened the week before the march to discuss a motion calling for SUTR to oppose CoFIS's participation. That motion, presented by SUTR affiliate SAAC, was subsequently rejected.

A demonstration outside of this meeting was held by the Revolutionary Communist Group (RCG), which had raised early warnings of SUTR's refusal to issue a statement rejecting CoFIS.

Despite having a close interest in the issue, GPHRC, as a non-SUTR affiliate, was not allowed access to the meeting.   

In recognition of all these growing concerns, the UK-wide Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) had also written to SUTR. Besides its conciliatory tone, it's important to note here the PSC's specific detailing of CoFIS as "the most offensive propagators of anti-Palestinian narratives", and calling this to the attention of SUTR.

Here's the exchange:
Earlier this week, PSC wrote to and held direct conversations with Stand Up to Racism (SUTR) about our concerns at the likely participation of the Confederation of Friends of Israel Scotland in the SUTR Glasgow march this Saturday. Yesterday we received a formal response. Both PSC’s letter and the SUTR response can be read below. 
PSC agrees with all of the sentiments contained within the SUTR Scottish steering committee statement. However, it does not address the concerns we raised about the participation of the Confederation of Friends of Israel Scotland in the Glasgow march.  It is our view – based on the Confederation’s  policies,  beliefs  and behaviours in Scotland, as set out in our letter, that their participation will necessarily  undermine the core message of the march and the important work that SUTR does. We would hope, even at this stage, that SUTR would make a clearer statement to address the concerns that have been raised. However, in the absence of any reassurances that Palestinians and their friends and supporters will not face a hostile environment if they attend the march, regrettably we cannot advise our members in Scotland to participate in an event whose core aims we very much support. 
We remain committed to an ongoing discussion with SUTR to resolve these issues so that we can work together on shared policies in combatting racism, islamophobia and anti-Semitism in the longer term. 
Letter from PSC: 
We wanted to follow up our telephone conversations with a written note about our concerns over the presence of the Confederation of Friends of Israel Scotland on the SUTR Glasgow march on Saturday. 
We are aware that a range of groups in Scotland including Scottish Friends of Palestine and SNP Friends of Palestine have raised their worries about the participation of the Confederation. These include the fact that this places Palestinians – including a group of Palestinian firefighters currently being trained by the FBU – in a hostile environment on a march they had intended to a join. 
Whilst we understand that SUTR want to build a broad coalition of partners wishing to fight racism – including anti-Semitism, a brief visit to the Facebook page of the Confederation reveals them as propagators of the most offensive anti-Palestinian narratives. These include denying the Palestinian Nakba and posting material stating that no Palestinian villages and towns were destroyed prior to and after the establishment of the state of Israel; denying the status of Palestinian refugees and posting an article from the CEO of AIPAC which states that any Palestinian state is incompatible with Israel’s security. The Confederation is also part of a campaign to have student activism on UK campuses under the banner of ‘Israel Apartheid Week’ closed down. The Confederation has links with groups in the UK who – alongside Britain First and the EDL – have attempted to disrupt PSC marches and meetings. 
We understand that the Confederation has framed its desire to attend within the context of an opposition to anti Semitism and that there is a concern that to indicate that their presence is not welcome will leave organisers open to the charge of anti-Semitism.There are many definitions of racism, but to promote prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against people of a different race, ethnicity or culture, as the Confederation does, must surely give you as organisers cause for concern.We would hope that there could be a clear statement that all of those organisations participating in a SUTR march need to stand on a platform of opposition  to all forms of racism – which includes resistance to or, at the very least,  not supporting the policies and laws of any state that are clearly racist. As organisers, we would hope that you would agree that anyone who cannot sign up to these basic principles would not be welcome and that behaviour designed to intimidate other participants will not be tolerated.We would hope it is not too late for such a statement to be issued. Notwithstanding this, after the events of this weekend, we would wish – as the PSC – to have a more detailed conversation with SUTR about the long term strategy to address these issues. 
Ben Jamal, PSC Director, and Hugh lanning, PSC Chair. 
SUTR Response 
Dear Ben and Hugh, 
For your information the SUTR Scottish Steering Committee unanimously agreed the following statement: 
Stand up to Racism is a broad coalition comprising many civic organisations, refugee and migrant communities, as well as trade unions, political organisations and individuals. The key criteria are opposition to the rising tide of racism, Islamophobia, Antisemitism and the scapegoating of refugees and migrants. If you support these principles please come and join us on M17.
Signatories: Scottish Trades Union Congress, Unison Scotland, Unite the Union Scotland, Educational Institute of Scotland, University and College Union Scotland, Scottish Labour Party, Church of Scotland, Justice and Peace Scotland, Scottish Council of Jewish Communities, Scottish Refugee Council, Muslim Council of Scotland, Scottish Faiths Action For Refugees, Show Racism The Red Card, City of Edinburgh Unison, Glasgow City Unison, Unison South Lanarkshire, Edinburgh College EIS-Fela, Unite Scottish Housing Associations branch, Unite NHS Ayrshire &; Arran, Unite GPM and IT Branch, Unite Glasgow retired members, MEND, Afghan Human Rights Foundation, Social Work Action Network, The People’s Assembly Scotland, Govanhill Baths Community Trust, Glasgow Campaign to Welcome Refugees, Govanhill Against Racism, Maryhill Integration Network, Perth Against Racism, Women for Independence Glasgow, Scottish Jews For A Just Peace, PCS Scotland, RMT Scotland, FBU Scotland, Interfaith Glasgow. 
We urge the Palestine Solidarity Campaign to join us. 
https://www.palestinecampaign.org/psc-statement-stand-racism-glasgow-march/
As can be seen, SUTR's response here amounts to no more than a reiteration of their rigid 'criteria', list of affiliates and call to join the march. It made no effort to engage the PSC's substantive points.

With no indication of SUTR addressing these concerns, or shifting its position, every major Palestine solidarity group withdrew their support for the march. 


Besides the PSC's call, a boycott of the march was advocated by Scottish Friends of Palestine, Association of Palestinian Community - Scotland, Glasgow Palestine Human Rights Campaign, Scottish Palestine Solidarity Campaign, the Muslim Council of Scotland, an ad hoc group of Jewish anti-racists, and SAAC. The Communist Party (Scotland) also announced its non-participation in rejection of CoFIS and in support of Palestinians. 


Consequently, SUTR's demonstration went ahead without the participation of an entire pro-Palestinian movement, Scotland's official Muslim organisation, and a number of other political/civil bodies. That, by any reasonable measure, is a significant loss to a body seeking to build a unified anti-racist movement. 


CoFIS did attempt to participate in the march, but were successfully slowed down and held back from the rally's main body by a commendable pro-Palestine grouping from West Dunbartonshire, carrying an imaginative representation of Israel's apartheid wall. The RCG also took a leading role in stalling CoFIS from marching.  


3. Many questions, thus, have to be asked about SUTR's failure to engage the wide concerns over CoFIS's presence, its fear of being falsely labelled/smeared as anti-Semitic, and its apparent inability to handle the issue in more principled and unifying ways.

So, what else might SUTR have done here?

Rather than the decision taken, SUTR could have followed the approach of Artists for Palestine UK (AFP).

In response to a 2017 Edinburgh 'Shalom' festival, organised by CoFIS and GFI, AFP issued a clear statement exposing CoFIS as a front organisation for the promotion of 'Brand Israel', and defender of Israel's apartheid/racist state.

Like AFP, SUTR were not obliged to approach CoFIS on the matter. AFP did not write directly to CoFIS. Rather, they made their position clear in an open letter signed by multiple figures, including Ken Loach and Paul Laverty, stating: "We call for a boycott of the misnamed "Shalom Festival", which promotes, not "peace", but the apartheid State of Israel and its occupation."

SUTR could have issued a similar-styled statement denouncing CoFIS and its attempted participation on their march.

People reading AFP's statement and article were helpfully informed about CoFIS's real agenda, and the case for Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) as a public counter-measure.

SUTR could have adopted that same approach - even without approving BDS.

Specifically, SUTR could have made a clear public statement saying that it had:

Looked closely at CoFIS as an organisation. 
Felt deeply concerned about its aggressive pro-Israel positions.
Realised that CoFIS was using the SUTR demonstration as a vehicle for its own agenda.
Feared that CoFIS was intent on dividing SUTR and Palestinian solidarity groups.
Concluded that CoFIS support for Israel's apartheid/racist state was incompatible with SUTR's own aims and values.
Stated that CoFIS, as an organisation, was not welcome at any SUTR event.

Having issued this open statement, CoFIS would, in turn, have had to consider whether it still wished to participate in such an event. If it decided not to, complaining that it had been excluded for anti-Semitic reasons, SUTR only had to repeat and defend their statement, rejecting this spurious claim. If CoFIS did appear at the march, SUTR would have been under no obligation to try and enforce their removal. Again, the statement deploring CoFIS as an organisation, and the reasons behind their attempted participation, would have been sufficient.

Others, within or beyond the march, would have been equally free to express their own peaceful opposition to such participation.

Any 'adverse' media fallout could, likewise, have been used to re-state SUTR's position, insisting that, as a hostile body and apartheid/racist-supporting organisation, CoFIS did not adhere to SUTR's own basic tenets. Rather than fear the publicity this might generate, SUTR and supporting organisations could have used the opportunity to reaffirm their common opposition to racism, and to bodies that openly, or as front groups, seek to defend Israel's racism/apartheid.

It's not intended here to castigate those SUTR associates with a long history of supporting Palestinian rights. It is, however, appropriate to ask that they now reflect carefully on SUTR's deeply misguided conduct, and its own damaged standing as an anti-racist organisation.  

This issue, and SUTR's dismal mishandling of it, should serve as a wider lesson to those who think that the pro-Israel lobby can be ignored, placated or simply wished away. 

You can't stand up to racism while turning your eyes from Israel's daily apartheid, and the organisations working to disguise it.

The evidence should be glaringly obvious to SUTR and any other body proclaiming serious anti-racist credentials.

While Palestinian child Ahed Tamimi's cruel incarceration and trial, over a minor slap, continues in a closed-door military court, an Israeli soldier has had his 18-month sentence for murdering a wounded Palestinian cut by a third.

An Arab family seeking to buy a piece of land in an Israeli town is refused permission by the mayor, fearing it would not be in keeping with its 'Jewish-Zionist nature'.

Palestinian workers are herded and crushed like caged animals on their way to menial work in Israel.

These are but small samples of Israel's routine racist crimes and apartheid practices, all of which CoFIS openly denies. 

It's remarkable to think that, as Israel's inhuman treatment of occupied, bombed and imprisoned people intensifies, an anti-racist group here in Scotland could be so reticent and fearful in standing up to an organisation defending those very racist crimes.  

As the building of real solidarity for Palestinians continues in Scotland, it's to be hoped that SUTR come to understand the need for true, decisive resistance to racist state apologists like CoFIS.


Tuesday, 13 March 2018

Stand up to Israel and its front campaigns

Israel is becoming increasingly isolated, as worldwide criticism mounts over its illegal Occupation, siege of Gaza and apartheid crimes, unleashing, in turn, an even more furious backlash from Israel and its global defenders.

In particular, rising support for Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) has prompted new reactionary responses from the Israeli state and an increasingly strident lobby.

Condemnation of Donald Trump's incendiary speech endorsing Jerusalem as Israel's capital has only intensified Israeli propaganda and lobby hubris.

This is evident in the many fabrications against Palestinian children, notably the branding of Palestinian child Ahed Tamimi as a 'terrorist' for slapping a soldier. Ahed and her mother, imprisoned just for filming the incident, have had their trial, before a closed door military court, continuously delayed, as Israel weighs up how to impose its harshest punishment.

Those damning Ahed also have to deal with the awkward fact that an Israeli soldier had just shot her 15-year-old cousin, Muhammad Tamimi, removing part of his skull. In a further vindictive act, Muhammad, awaiting vital surgery, was again arrested in a night raid and forced to confess he had sustained his injury from a bike fall. Even after his doctors had shown medical proof of the shooting, an unapologetic lobby continue maligning the Tamimi family.    

It's all part of a relentless hasbara, seeking to control the narrative and intimidate anyone inclined to criticise Israel. US comedian Sarah Silverman was also denounced for urging fellow Jews to stand up for Ahed. The lobby even turned on Gary Lineker for daring to question Israel's brutal treatment of children.

With Netanyahu approving a new $75 million "public relations commando unit" to counter BDS, the lobby is now using every form of threat and distortion. With further menacing intent, Gilad Erdan, Israel's minister of strategic affairs, is leading a "black-ops" campaign against BDS.

Heading a growing list of artists endorsing BDS, noted musician Roger Waters has felt the lobby's fiercest wrath, with pressure on sponsors and legal threats to close down his shows. Admirably, Waters remains unfazed.

New Zealand singer Lorde has also experienced intense lobby intimidation after refusing to play Israel. Two young women, one Jewish, one Palestinian, who sent a letter asking Lorde to support BDS are being sued by pro-Israel legal group, Shurat HaDin.

Alongside 'Brand Israel', and paying students for hasbara trolling, online Palestine activists are now being censored as part of the pretext corporate clampdown on 'fake news'. Glenn Greenwald notes how Facebook executives approved Israel's requests to delete huge numbers of pro-Palestine accounts. 

Unlike the raging hysteria over 'Russiagate', Western media aren't rushing to report Israel's dark meddlings.

Escalating fears over BDS and Israel's declining image has also placed the US lobby on heightened political alert. The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), and Anti-Defamation League (ADL) are leading an extensive attack on BDS through The Israel Anti-Boycott Act, legislation opposed by the American Civil Liberties Union as a violation of First Amendment rights.

Jonathan Cook notes that what's "special about the Israel lobby in the US – an amalgam of hawkish Jewish leadership organisations and messianic Christian evangelicals – is the fear it exploits to silence critics. No one wants to be labelled an anti-Semite."

Stand With Us are part of that same right-wing network, running multiple pro-Israel campaigns, and opposing Anti-Apartheid Week. It has been "accused of anti-Muslim propaganda and encouraging a militant Israeli and U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East." 


The group was widely criticised after one of its media advisers wrote a virulent article disparaging common support between oppressed Palestinians and black protesters in Ferguson. The author was defended by Hen Mazzig, another Stand With Us associate with rabid right-wing views. 

The same US lobby have also launchedvociferous attack on Al Jazeera's forthcoming exposé of US lobby activity.

In the UK, Al Jazeera's previous undercover investigation has already revealed key connections between lobby bodies and the Israeli Embassy. With Priti Patel's recent 'family holiday' in Israel, and co-lobbyist Lord Stuart Polak, also now exposed, Conservative Friends of Israel are now ratcheting-up the fear, as in Michael Gove's shrill warnings on Palestine activists' "dark and furious energy". 

The enduringly Blairite Labour Friends of Israel remain on-message too, with Emily Thornberry delivering a speech to LFI "that could have been written by a pro-Israel lobbyist".

And the lobby's relentless smearing of Jeremy Corbyn for 'harbouring anti-Semitism' goes on, no matter how much he denounces such tendencies. 

Jonathan Cook also shows here how Owen Jones engaged lobby insiders, the Jewish Labour Movement, further serving to subvert Corbyn.

Encouragingly, newly-founded Jewish Voice for Labour now provide a strong counter to JLM's smear agenda, while Jews For a Just Peace have declared their support for BDS.

However, all this pressure on Israel has spurred other zealous lobbying.  

One group pursuing that kind of mission here is the Confederation of Friends of Israel Scotland (CoFIS), an avowedly pro-Israel organisation masquerading as 'pro-peace' street campaigns. This includes Glasgow Friends of Israel (GFI).

Besides evangelising for Israel and whitewashing its crimes, CoFIS consistently attack and smear Palestine solidarity groups.

Ignoring multiple UN resolutions and international law, CoFIS defends Israel's illegal acts, refusing to back key Palestinian rights and claims to full statehood. It approves Israel's apartheid wall, blames Israel's mass killing in Gaza on Hamas, and fails to condemn Israel's shooting and incarceration of children. It consistently applauds Netanyahu. It hails Trump and his recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital. It denounces BDS and artists like Roger Waters. And it insists on Ahed Tamimi being punished as a 'terrorist'. 

Much of the literature CoFIS hands out to the public comes from the same visceral US right-wing group, Stand With Us.

Director Ken Loach, writer Paul Laverty, and actor Tam Dean Burn were among signatory Artists for Palestine UK who, in 2017, opposed CoFIS's "misnamed “Shalom Festival”, which promotes, not “peace”, but the apartheid State of Israel and its occupation." 

Their letter stated that the Festival, organised by CoFIS founder Nigel Goodrich and GFI's Sammy Stein, and endorsed by Stand With Us, was "part of the State of Israel’s attempts to counter BDS. It claims to support “peaceful coexistence” in Israel/Palestine, while whitewashing Israel’s violations of Palestinian rights."

CoFIS claim to be 'anti-racist', while denying the inhuman effects of the Occupation, the calamity of Gaza, and Israel's colonial settlements. This mirrors the very same deception Israel has peddled for generations with its contrived 'peace process', using every opportunity to extend the settlements, imprison Gaza, and deepen its racist treatment of Palestinians.

CoFIS has no support from Palestinian civil society. While it speaks of 'shared interests' and 'open dialogue', drawing in virtue-signalling liberals and unwary progressives, serious observers see this 'pro-peace' line for what it is: a cynical charade and continuous stalling exercise, serving to normalise Israel's land thefts, and prioritise its 'security concerns'. As with BDS, meaningful solidarity remains focused on real strategic action, helping to expose the multiple fronts and guises of Israel's lobby.

People of conscience, whatever their background or religious beliefs, should reject any organisation which seeks to approve and defend Israel's apartheid state. And they should be particularly alert to any group which seeks to conceal their real purpose through stealth insertion into parliamentary life, mainstream parties or civil movements. 

If we accept that, as with South Africa, apartheid is racism, there should be no place for Israel-protecting bodies like CoFIS within any authentic anti-racism event or demonstration.

Rejection will, inevitably, be met with the same lobby backlash. But leftists should defend their position with principled argument rather than capitulate for fear of being falsely labelled. There's no placating or appeasing this lobby. 

Campaigns which help hide Israel's mass crimes have to be resisted with moral resolve and tactical intent. You cannot stand up to racism while lying down to Israel's apartheid.

*(This is an abbreviated version of my previous blog article.)

Tuesday, 27 February 2018

Serious solidarity must resist the Israel lobby and its front campaigns

Israel is becoming increasingly isolated, as worldwide opinion intensifies over its illegal Occupation, siege of Gaza and apartheid crimes against Palestinians.

This, in turn, has seen an even more furious backlash from Israel and its global support network.

In particular, rising support for Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) and other direct civil action has prompted new reactionary responses from the Israeli state, matched by an increasingly strident lobby.

Donald Trump's incendiary speech endorsing Jerusalem as Israel's capital has only added to the sequence of global opposition, Israeli belligerence and lobby hubris.

This is a lobby now turning on 'moderate' public figures like Gary Lineker for daring to question Israel's brutal treatment of children.

Some Palestinian minors are now receiving longer sentences for throwing stones at their weapons-loaded occupiers than the token tariffs handed down to the same soldiers for killing Palestinians.

Yet, as damning evidence grows of the shooting, detention and torture of children, Israel and its lobby are lambasting human rights groups like B'Tselem for helping to record and highlight such abuses, including harsh interrogation and coerced confessions.

Australian film Stone Cold Justice, revealing the scandalous extent of Israel's detention and illegal treatment of children, has, likewise, been attacked, with the lobby group CAMERA repeating army slurs that the film's reporter was "travelling the world spreading ignorance, propaganda and lies."

Ahed Tamimi
With continuing disregard for truth or justice, the same lobby has also now denounced Palestinian child Ahed Tamimi as a 'terrorist' for slapping a soldier.

Ahed and her mother, imprisoned just for filming the incident, have seen their trial, before a closed door military court, continuously delayed, as Israel weighs up how to impose its harshest punishment, while handling global disgust over their treatment.

Muhammad Tamimi
The fact that the Israeli army had just shot Ahed's 15-year-old cousin Muhammad, wasting his skull and disfiguring him for life, seems of no proportionate concern to Israel's lobby apologists.

The maiming and killing of Palestinian kids is, of course, a routine part of daily existence across the West Bank and Gaza.

In an act of vindictive revenge on the Tamimi family, Muhammad, still awaiting vital surgery, was arrested, along with five other children, in another night raid on their village of Nabi Saleh.

Devoid of compassionate response, the violence being perpetrated on Ahed and her family has only further inflamed Israel's supporters.

US comedian Sarah Silverman was also roundly denounced by the lobby for calling on fellow Jews to stand up for Ahed.

It's all part of a relentless hasbara, seeking to control the Israel-Palestine narrative, manage international opinion, frame media coverage, maintain pressure on editors, and intimidate anyone inclined to criticise Israel's actions.

With Netanyahu approving a new $75 million "public relations commando unit" to counter BDS, the lobby is now using every form of intimidation, smear and diversion to protect and advocate for Israel.

With further menacing intent, Gilad Erdan, Israel's minister of strategic affairs, is reported to be leading a "black-ops" campaign against BDS.

In heading-up a growing list of artists challenging Israel and endorsing BDS, noted musician Roger Waters has felt the lobby's fiercest wrath, with pressure calls on sponsors and sustained legal attempts to close down his stadium shows. Admirably, Waters remains resilient in his stand against the lobby and Israeli apartheid.

The decision by New Zealand singer Lorde not to play Israel is a further key encouragement to artists. Lorde has also been subjected to intense lobby intimidation, while the two young New  Zealander women, one Jewish, one Palestinian, who wrote to Lorde urging her to “join the artistic boycott of Israel” are now being sued by pro-Israel legal group, Shurat HaDin. 

This all comes on top of a 'Brand Israel' PR campaign, and major government drive to pay students for hasbara trolling.

A growing purge on pro-Palestinian online activity is also now evident, part of the pretext corporate clampdown on 'fake news'. 

Glenn Greenwald notes how, backed by powerful US politicians, Israel "summoned Facebook executives in October of last year to a meeting and directed them to delete the accounts of a huge number of Palestinian activists, journalists, commentators. And Facebook obeyed in almost every one of the cases.

Unlike the raging hysteria over 'Russiagate' and 'Putin trolls', most Western media have little to say about Israel's own dark efforts to influence other states' politics.


In the US, escalating fears over BDS and Israel's declining image has now placed the lobby on heightened political alert. Led by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and Anti-Defamation League (ADL), a wide array of pro-Israel groups - such as the Israel Project, Fuel For Truth, Israel on Campus Coalition, and Foundation for the Defense of Democracies - are seeking to break BDS through promotion of The Israel Anti-Boycott Act

The proposed legislation is opposed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) as a violation of First Amendment rights. 


Stand With Us (also known as the Israel Emergency Alliance), another relentless right-wing US-based advocate, with close ties to the Israeli government, has backed the bill, even trying to 'reassure' liberals of the Act's 'benign' intent. 

Contrary to such posturing, the real face of Stand With Us was exposed after one of its media advisers wrote a virulently racist article disparaging common support between oppressed Palestinians and black protesters in Ferguson, St Louis. The article's author was defended by Hen Mazzig, another Stand With Us official with rabid right-wing views. 

Stand With Us is engaged in multiple forms of pro-Israel advocacy, including teaching programmes on college campuses, media spinning on Israel's harsh treatment of African migrants, and opposing the annual Israel Anti-Apartheid Week. It has also been "accused of anti-Muslim propaganda and encouraging a militant Israeli and U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East." 

Closely integrated with other conservative forces, much of the US lobby has long enjoyed protected status. As Jonathan Cook adds: "What is special about the Israel lobby in the US – an amalgam of hawkish Jewish leadership organisations and messianic Christian evangelicals – is the fear it exploits to silence critics. No one wants to be labelled an anti-Semite.


However, for Cook, the whole lobby is now being increasingly scrutinised: "as recent events illustrate, the lobby is struggling to stay in the shadows. Social media and Palestinians with camera phones have exposed a global audience to systematic abuses by the Israeli army the western media largely ignored. For the first time, Israel supporters sound evasive and dissembling."


In one key rearguard response, the same pro-Israel nexus has launched a vociferous attack on Al Jazeera's forthcoming exposé of the lobby itself. 


There are strong indications here of lobby pressure on Qatar to block the film, and suspicions of compliance, largely motivated by Doha's efforts to win back the support of Trump. AIPAC's many powerful friends in Congress are also trying to undermine the film by making Al Jazeera register as a 'foreign agent.'


Growing lobby activity is evident, too, in the UK. With the true purpose of Priti Patel's recent 'family holiday' in Israel, facilitated by Israel lobbyist Lord Stuart Polak, duly exposed, lobby activity has been sustained by other key parliamentary movers around the Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI). This includes Michael Gove's warnings on pro-Palestine activists' "dark and furious energy", a speech duly commended by Christian Friends of Israel.

Another key aspect of CFI's real dark energy can be seen in its secretive relations with major arms firms like Elbit, all serving to keep Israel armed to the teeth, and specially protected by Britain's state-military establishment. 

The enduringly Blairite Labour Friends of Israel has also been lobbying hard. With Shadow Foreign Secretary Emily Thornberry openly expressing her disdain for BDS in a speech to LFI "that could have been written by a pro-Israel lobbyist", LFI have been working to mute other senior figures, such as Kate Osamor, after she declared her support for BDS.

Labour's Ruth Smeeth is another notable pro-Israel party figure, with close connections to leading PR body the Britain Israel Communications and Research Centre (BICOM), and 'watchdog' group Community Security Trust (CST).

According to former Institute for Jewish Policy Research director Antony Lerman, the CST has been “abusing its mandate” in order to give “political support for Israel.” 

Localised groups like Sussex Friends of Israel offer further insight on the growing aggressive face of the pro-Israel street lobby.

Al Jazeera's previous undercover investigation of UK lobby activity, exposing the particular role of Israeli diplomat Shai Masot, reveals much about the linkages between Britain's pro-Israel bodies and the Israeli Embassy.

And, of course, the calculated smear campaign waged against Jeremy Corbyn and the wider left for 'harbouring anti-Semitism' is a foremost example of the lobby's pernicious agenda.

No matter how much Corbyn seeks to denounce such tendencies, and safeguard his party from discriminatory practices, the drip-drip insinuations and distortions continue.

Jonathan Cook also relates here how Owen Jones was courted, and willingly engaged, lobby insiders the Jewish Labour Movement (JLM), further legitimising this group in its efforts to subvert Corbyn.

Encouragingly, the newly-founded Jewish Voice for Labour is now acting as a strong counter to the JLM lobby.

Jews For a Just Peace have also declared their support for BDS, a clear and exemplary statement of their anti-apartheid bona fides.

However, rising support for the Palestinian cause, including the welcome backing of Jewish-based bodies, has seen other duplicitous groups now advocating for Israel.

In Scotland, the lobby is attempting to spread its message via the Confederation of Friends of Israel Scotland (CoFIS), an avowedly pro-Israel organisation masquerading as a set of 'pro-peace' street campaigns, including Glasgow Friends of Israel (GFI).

Besides propagating for Israel, CoFIS's core task is to attack, smear and undermine Palestine solidarity groups in Scotland.

Ignoring multiple UN resolutions and international law, CoFIS consistently defend Israel's illegal acts, refusing to acknowledge basic Palestinian rights and legitimate claims to statehood.

It approves Israel's apartheid wall. It blames Israel's mass killing in Gaza on Hamas. It fails to condemn Israel's incarceration and shooting of children, or the callous bulldozing of Palestinian houses. It routinely lauds Netanyahu. It openly approves Trump, and his recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital. It denounces BDS and artists like Roger Waters. And it calls upon Ahed Tamimi to be treated and punished as a 'terrorist'.

Much of the literature CoFIS hands out to the public comes from the same US right-wing campaign group, Stand With Us.

And CoFIS do, indeed, stand with them. CoFIS founder Nigel Goodrich and his associates embrace the same basic ideology and lobby agenda in evangelising for Israel and whitewashing its crimes.

Director Ken Loach, writer Paul Laverty, theatre director Clare McGarry, actor Tam Dean Burn, and theatre critic Mark Brown were among signatory Artists for Palestine UK who, in 2017, opposed CoFIS's "misnamed “Shalom Festival”, which promotes, not “peace”, but the apartheid State of Israel and its occupation." 

Their letter stated that the Festival, organised by Goodrich and GFI's Sammy Stein, was "part of the State of Israel’s attempts to counter BDS. It claims to support “peaceful coexistence” in Israel/Palestine, while whitewashing Israel’s violations of Palestinian rights. This is the language of the Israeli state itself, and is code for continued occupation and oppression of the Palestinian people and the ongoing denial of the right of return of millions of Palestinian refugees."


Artists for Palestine UK also noted the supporting bodies and message of the event: "Glossy display panels and piles of leaflets and brochures from StandWithUs and Christians United for Israel, an extreme rightwing Islamophobic organisation with a large following in the United States, pressed Israel’s biblical claim to the whole of the Holy Land and demonised BDS as a movement in sympathy with ISIS terror."


Like other lobby groups, CoFIS make voluble claims about wanting 'dialogue', professing to be 'non-discriminatory', and 'anti-racist', while denying the inhuman effects of the Occupation, the calamity of Gaza, and Israel's colonial settlements.

This mirrors the very same deception Israel itself has peddled for generations in its contrived calls for a 'peace process', while using every opportunity to extend the settlements, intensify the Occupation, imprison Gaza, and deepen its racist treatment of Palestinians.

Much of this pro-Israel street action hides behind the pretentious garb of 'community engagement', urging 'shared understanding' of 'both Israel's and Palestinians' interests', a window-dressing exercise which, alas, still seems appealing to some virtue-signalling liberals and unwary progressives.

In contrast, rational observers have long since seen the 'peace process' for what it is: a cynical charade; a continuous stalling mechanism, serving to normalise and legitimate Israel's land thefts, and prioritise its 'security concerns'.

As with the BDS movement, serious solidarity groups have long understood the need to keep fully focused on effective, strategic forms of civil action, a key part of which is exposing the multiple fronts and guises of the Israel lobby.

Palestine is sometimes seen by some on the left as a 'peripheral' and 'awkward' question, rather than integral to left anti-imperialism. Much of that left ambivalence is due less to straight lobby propaganda than exposure to the more veiled liberal version of lobby discourse, as peddled by people like Jonathan Freedland and much of the Guardian, with its loaded 'two-sides narrative', and pitching of Palestine as a 'complex', 'divisive' and 'intractable' problem.

Again, this is all insidious diversion, cloaked in 'doveish' language, serving the wider lobby's attempts to blur the real issue - Israel's crimes - and undermine serious solidarity.

Any real progressive response must, in turn, be more vigilant to false fears, smears and liberal persuasions.

People of conscience, whatever their background or religious beliefs, should reject any organisation which seeks to approve and defend Israel's apartheid state. And they should be particularly alert to any group which seeks to conceal their real purpose through stealth insertion into parliamentary life, mainstream parties or civil movements.

If we accept that, as with South Africa, apartheid is racism, then there should be no place for Israel-supporting organisations like CoFIS within any serious anti-racism event or demonstration.

And, besides suffering Palestinians, let's also remember here Israel's appalling treatment of its own, largely African, migrant population. As reported: "Netanyahu has called the migrants’ presence a threat to Israel’s social fabric and Jewish character, and one government minister has referred to them as “a cancer”."

It's inevitable that open rejection of organisations like CoFIS will be met with the same backlash unleashed by the wider pro-Israel lobby. Yet, this should make the response of leftists and others of good progressive mind even clearer. Much better to take a principled position and defend your case with confident argument than capitulate to such forces for fear of being falsely labelled and smeared. There's no placating or appeasing this network. It will come after solidarity groups whatever its 'inclusion' or rejection.

Lobby groups and campaigns which help defend and hide Israel's mass violations and crimes against humanity have to be resisted with moral resolve and tactical intent. You can't fully stand up to racism while lying down to apartheid.